I have
always admired what I call "the beauty of function".
This is the inherent grace and value we perceive in
a masterful design, as when a piece of furniture offers
optimal comfort and performance. We also see it in
fine automobiles and planes. There are no specific
functions for a painting, no absolute parameters for
its design, but still I wondered. Could I someday express
such "beauty of function" in my work?

Ceramics set me in the right direction, asking me to
consider why I could sense a limitless universe within
a few inches of fired clay. Ceramic bowls in particular
achieve a delicate balance between their man-made beauty
of function and their ornamental beauty, which owes
so much to fire and other natural elements.

I've also learned a great deal from the folding screens
made hundreds of years ago by Japan's Rimpa school
of artists. Time has worn away sections of their gold
and silver leaf and darkened other areas, lending these
screens a uniquely abstract quality. This aspect is
further heightened by the Rimpa artists' own approach.
Their work was basically representational, but they
also stylized their subjects and incorporated elements
similar to modern graphic design.

Perhaps I can assign a function to my paintings; they
are tools for recreating the landscapes in my mind.
Always I try to strike a balance between nature and
intent. I dye sheets of Japanese washi paper with acrylics,
letting creases and graduations of color emerge as
naturally as possible, and then arrange that paper
in specific patterns.

In short, I want my paintings to create themselves
as much as they are created by me.
I want them to speak to people all over the world,
to form a@bond between the images on the wall and the
feelings in peoplefs hearts.